with thanks to thisisnorthkensington.wordpress.com

Comments

DAMESATHOME@GMAIL.COM
send the Dame your information, discretion assured.
Comments are welcome but do not necessarily reflect the view of the Dame.
Offensive/inappropriate comments will be deleted and the poster banned.

Wednesday, 16 February 2011

Council Attendance 2009/10

You would have read how much those lucky fellows in the Town Hall received last year for their council duties, and quite handsomely some of them. One of their duties is to turn up to council meetings, the full council met seven times last year and here Hornet provides you with a breakdown of attendance at these Council meetings.


Firstly, attendance by party:


Party      %Attendance
Conservative 91.2%
Labour         87.3%
LibDem         83.3%



Now, find your ward and you can see how many times your area was represented at the full Council meetings:

EARLS COURT 100.0%
GOLBORNE    100.0%

HANS TOWN 100.0%
PEMBRIDGE 100.0%
REDCLIFFE 100.0%
CAMPDEN     95.2%
NOTT BARNS  95.2%
STANLEY     95.2%
COLVILLE    90.5%
COURTFIELD  90.5%
QUEENS GATE 90.5%
ABINGDON    85.7%
CREMORNE    85.7%
NORLAND     85.7%
ST CHARLES  85.7%
HOLLAND     81.0%
BROMPTON   76.2%
RYL HOSP    66.7%


Now turning up to the meeting is one thing, but what about actually contributing to the meeting?

12 Petitions were submitted to council meetings in 2009/2010. Here shows you by whom, what party and what Ward:

By Ward           By Party              By Councillor
GOLBORNE   5      Labour 9        Blakeman      4
NOTT BARNS 4      Conservative 2 Hoier         3
ABINGDON   1      LibDem 1 Dent-Coad     2
COLVILLE   1      Total       12        Caruana       1
NORLAND    1                   Gardner       1
Total   12 Lindsay       1
Grand Total  12




14 Motions were proposed at council meetings:


By Ward           By Party              By Councillor
GOLBORNE     4    Labour 11 Dent-Coad     4

NOTT BARNS   4    Conservative  3 Blakeman      3
COLVILLE     3    LibDem        0 Oneill        3
STANLEY      2    Grand Total 14 Atkinson      1
HANS TOWN    1 Cockell       1
ABINGDON     0 Frazer        1
BROMPTON     0 Paget-Brown   1
CAMPDEN      0 Grand Total  14
COURTFIELD   0
CREMORNE     0
EARLS COURT  0
HOLLAND      0
NORLAND      0
PEMBRIDGE    0
QUEENS GATE  0
REDCLIFFE    0
RYL HOSP     0
ST CHARLES   0
Grand Total 14




and finally 11 were questions asked (technophobes, this is contributions under S19):


By Ward                 By Party            By Councillor

COLVILLE 3 Conservative   5      Mason        2
EARLS COURT 2 Labour         5      Oneill        2
GOLBORNE 2 LibDem         1      Phelps        2
ABINGDON 1 Grand Total   11      Atkinson      1
NOTT BARNS 1                             B Campbell   1
PEMBRIDGE 1                             Caruana       1
REDCLIFFE 1                             Gardner       1
BROMPTON 0                             Williams      1
CAMPDEN     0                             Grand Total  11
COURTFIELD 0
CREMORNE 0
HANS TOWN 0
HOLLAND     0
NORLAND     0
QUEENS GATE 0
RYL HOSP 0
ST CHARLES 0
STANLEY     0
Grand Tot  11



If your ward is a zero, or your councillor isnt listed, its because no questions, petitions or motions were asked, submitted or proposed by them for the whole year.


Now you know.

2 comments:

  1. Looks like these councillors have rushed ahead of David Cameron and formed their own Big Society grabbing loads of allowances for doing nothing. Most can't even be bothered to hold surgeries. Appalling performance in Hans Town and Royal Hospital

    ReplyDelete
  2. NO SURPRISES CREMORNE WARD COUNCILLORS SAID NOTHING - WHAT IS THE NAME OF THEIR CIRCULAR? - "out of sight and out of touch"! IT WOULD BE INTERESTING TO KNOW WHERE AND HOW THEY INCURRED EXPENSES ON BEHALF OF RESIDENTS IN THE WARD

    ReplyDelete

Comments are your responsibility. Anyone posting inappropriate comments shall have their comment removed and will be banned from posting in future. Your IP address may also be recorded and reported. Persistent abuse shall mean comments will be severely restricted in future.