A 'Sophie Dixon' has posted two comments about a Conservative councillor. They have been removed due to their defamatory nature.
If followers of the Dame have information about councillors she prefers they contact via her personal email. The Dame is then able to judge whether they are fit to publish.
It is really not fair to post comments of a defamatory nature...not fair to the Dame who becomes liable; nor fair to the subject of defamatory comment.
Comments are unmoderated so followers are expected to use their judgment and act maturely.
if a Councillor / person is "Defamed" who are they going to sue?
ReplyDeleteThis is a total red herring, to justify censorship.
The Dame does not need to justify any 'censorship' she chooses to exercise. In this case the comment accused a leading Conservative cllr of being a user of crack cocaine. She has also censored a comment implying that another councillor had had issues with the South Africa Police:neither story could be verified thus neither sppeared
ReplyDeleteBoth stories are true
ReplyDeletethe truth has never been the hornets strongest card
ReplyDeleteVery funny....judged against your Leader and his dissembling over expenses the Dame is a model of veracity. Some advice....don't tilt at windmills you will come off worse. Pooter told blatant lies about his use of the Bentley and then had the inelegance to say his misinforming was 'political'!!
ReplyDeleteIts nοt my first time to pay a quick viѕit this web sіte, i am browsing this ωеb sitе daіlly and obtain gоod іnfoгmation frοm here all the timе.
ReplyDeleteMy weblоg :: First Home
it was a wonderful chance to visit this kind of site and I am happy to know. thank you so much for giving us a chance to have this opportunity.. Diet Supplements
ReplyDeleteYour work is very good and I appreciate you and hopping for some more informative posts. Thank you for sharing great information to us. Smart Home
ReplyDelete