Comments

DAMESATHOME@YAHOO.CO.UK
send the Dame your information, discretion assured.
Comments are welcome but do not necessarily reflect the view of the Dame.
Offensive/inappropriate comments will be deleted and the poster banned.

Wednesday, 17 April 2013

WHO FIDDLED WITH POOTER'S WILKI ENTRY?

WILKI FIDLER TOO?








From a Loyal Reader....

Dear Dame,

Did you see that somebody deleted the body of the expenses of Councillor Merrick on his wikipedia page. Do you know who?

Edited on 25th March by a wikipedia user The ed17 who deleted the lot, all the expenses and FTHN content deleted. 

Sincerely

G

We all know the shame Pooter feels for his grotesque expense record and hates the press and Hornet attacks upon him.... but should The ed17- allegedly a press officer in the Council's PR Department, be used for what is a private matter. The Dame thinks(if true) it's an outrageous abuse of council services. 
Maybe she heard from internal source...but she is not telling!
But we all hope that Pooter has not the same tendencies as that other alleged Wilki fiddler, Chuka Umunna

4 comments:

  1. Why did he delete his record? What a hypocrite

    ReplyDelete
  2. Even more interesting who put the details on? But Pooter is rightly proud of his Guiness Book of Record expenses. No mention of that in the PR blurb on the Council Website. I wonder why? Answers again to the Council PR Department, postcards only please and for the best answer dinner for two at the Four Seasons in New York, all expenses paid. Second Prize lunch for two at the Fat Duck.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cockell is obviously in overdrive to find a replacement income for his Council "double jobbing". Cleaning up the references. I see the Education Qualifications have been removed too.....

    ReplyDelete
  4. He has no education.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are your responsibility. Anyone posting inappropriate comments shall have their comment removed and will be banned from posting in future. Your IP address may also be recorded and reported. Persistent abuse shall mean comments will be severely restricted in future.