Comments
DAMESATHOME@GMAIL.COM
send the Dame your information, discretion assured.
Comments are welcome but do not necessarily reflect the view of the Dame.
Offensive/inappropriate comments will be deleted and the poster banned.
THE UNDECLARED BUSINESS EMPIRE OF CLLR WARRICK
This nondescript building in Plough Lane of the fringe of the City is a place Cllr Warrick knows much about.
It is the HQ of a company he is a director of. But why so shy about declaring it on the Council's Registrar of Interests?
Looks like Warrick has been truly skewered by the Dame. Ha, ha, ha!
ReplyDeleteServes him right. Pompous, arrogant twit.
Three cheers for the Dame ! ! !
ReplyDeleteShifty looking cove, Warrick. Good idea to turn over the stones and see what is under
ReplyDeleteWhat is the company, Dame?
ReplyDeleteGastronomica Pimlico
ReplyDeleteIs it a money laundry?
ReplyDeleteMaybe Ludo could have a look into it, when he gets back from Tuscany? Here is his starting point, from CompanyCheck. Oh dear!
£1,779
Cash
£-36,378
Net Worth
£56,922
Assets
£117,800
Liabilities
Ludo is in Barbados staying with Sir Philip Green....Barbados, the Sandbanks of the West Indies
Delete- and this:
ReplyDeleteDirector Overview
Paul Warrick holds 6 appointments at 5 active companies, has resigned from 1 companies and held 10 appointments at 9 dissolved companies. Paul began their first appointment at the age of 46. Their longest current appointment spans 22 years and 6 months at VINCOMIDA LIMITED.
The combined cash at bank value for all businesses where Paul holds a current appointment equals £145,289, with a combined assets value of £1,082,245 and liabilities of £778,234. Roles associated with Paul Warrick within the recorded businesses include: Company Secretary, Director, Llp Member.
I thought that you only had to declare an interest in land in the local authority area that you are a member of?
ReplyDeleteYou have to declares offices you hold. A director and secretary are offices.
ReplyDeleteNothing whatever about his thriving career as a solicitor then?
ReplyDeleteAs we thought.
Solicitor? Not according to the Law Society!
Delete