Comments

DAMESATHOME@YAHOO.CO.UK
send the Dame your information, discretion assured.
Comments are welcome but do not necessarily reflect the view of the Dame.
Offensive/inappropriate comments will be deleted and the poster banned.

Tuesday, 19 September 2017

INSPECTOR CLOUSEAU STRIKES AGAIN!

Councillor Palmer replied to a resident who read the news in the Hornet's Nest about the upcoming resignations of two councillors....
PALMER
QUEEN'S GATE WARD IDIOT
Dear ......, Just so you know the web site you are quoting from used to have an( Palmer's grammar!) contact email address that could only be found in two places, one was on its own home page, the other place was as a point of access for pass codes(sic) to a paedophiles web site. When this was discovered, the police were called in and both web sites(sic) changed their details over night.(sic) The editors of the web site(sic) have never explained how that could happen or which editor was receiving the requests for access.
Thank
Councillor Palmer

If, as Cllr Palmer suggests the Dame's humble little site is as he says why on earth did the police not take action? 
Maybe the answer is that they thought, like thousands of others, Cllr Palmer was barking mad!

Could Cllr Palmer's obsession with paedophilia have something to do with his great friendships with convicted paedo, ex Cllr Lamont and ex Cllr Phelps whose interest in circulating images of young boys led, at the instigation of the Dame, to him being thrown off the Council.


7 comments:

  1. Palmer gives Conservatives a bad name: he's such an oaf

    ReplyDelete
  2. A prat. Through and through.

    All residents are entitled to visit the public gallery at Council Meetings to see the back row idiot at play. And to listen to his irrational and juvenile screamings whenever he stands up to perform. Fellow Tories wilt with shame. Labour revel in his performances.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Palmer is barking (mad). At this critical time the Tories need to dump the baggage

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh my goodness is he MAD?

    ReplyDelete
  5. But will the Tories have enough candidates by next May? Will they even dare put up candidates in North Kensington?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Now that's an interesting point. Quite possibly not. Who would stand? They'd have to be crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Now all the alleged do-gooders have to consider standing next year. And, Lord behold, they may get elected. Good thing or not, will be proven in their actions/inactions. But, certainly will be a much needed tsunami of change.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are your responsibility. Anyone posting inappropriate comments shall have their comment removed and will be banned from posting in future. Your IP address may also be recorded and reported. Persistent abuse shall mean comments will be severely restricted in future.