with thanks to thisisnorthkensington.wordpress.com

Comments

DAMESATHOME@GMAIL.COM
send the Dame your information, discretion assured.
Comments are welcome but do not necessarily reflect the view of the Dame.
Offensive/inappropriate comments will be deleted and the poster banned.

Friday, 5 October 2018

COME CLEAN, POOTER COCKELL

SHIFTY LOOKING POOTER


Readers will be aware that the Dame and her readers have demanded Pooter Cockell make an unequivocal statement confirming that he had the correct citizenship qualifications to stand as a councillor.
He has been asked to provide this information by a very senior RBKC officer and we are now standing by to see if he will ease the fears that he may never have been qualified to represent Stanley Ward.
Come on, Cockell, show us evidence that you were a British citizen or that you had dual British and S. African citizen during the period SA was not a Commonwealth member.

12 comments:

  1. Dear Dame,

    I don't think he will show any evidence of his UK citizenship covering the period that South Africa was out of the Commonwealth. If he has committed an offence by serving on the Council when he was not entitled to do so then he should be reported to the authorities.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Which Senior Council Officer has asked for proof of citizenship?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think if her Dameship wanted you to know she would have divulged

      Delete
    2. The gracious noble lady needs prompting some times.

      Delete
  3. My gut feeling is is that Cockell suddenly found himself in a quandary when SA left the Commonwealth so decided to keep quiet. His mother was a Kern from Jo'burg-a Jewish family who probably felt no reason to give up SA nationality. The who thing is mired in mystery. Democracy demands that the truth be outed

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pooter will have to resign from all his Directorships if he is found to have been a naughty boy. Cractus had better start looking for a new Chairman.

    ReplyDelete
  5. How could this have happened, unless there was some collusion? Surely, the process of appointment is to provide all the necessary evidence/documents to satisfy his appointment? How many years did he deceive us all?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He may not have deceived us. He may be kosher. He needs to reassure us that he was genuinely qualified to represent us. In terms of validation the onus is on the candidate to fill in his stuff in good faith.

      Delete
    2. :-) indeed - 'kosher' in more than one meaning of the word. SO, it is now up to him to convince us. Is he actually obliged to do so? If he does not, what may happen? Nixie,I guess. It all after the fact - let's look for the horse, while we polish the cart.

      Delete
  6. I just love the choice of photograph on this page. Brilliant!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Grotesque in the extreme!

    ReplyDelete

Comments are your responsibility. Anyone posting inappropriate comments shall have their comment removed and will be banned from posting in future. Your IP address may also be recorded and reported. Persistent abuse shall mean comments will be severely restricted in future.