They claim the adoption of the Earl’s Court/West Kensington Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (LBHF) and by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) was unlawful.
with thanks to thisisnorthkensington.wordpress.com
Comments
DAMESATHOME@GMAIL.COM
send the Dame your information, discretion assured.Comments are welcome but do not necessarily reflect the view of the Dame.
Offensive/inappropriate comments will be deleted and the poster banned.
Saturday, 23 June 2012
EARLS COURT RESIDENTS versus SOUTH AFRICAN DEVELOPERS AND COUNCILS
Earls Court residents launch legal proceedings against development. The West Kensington and Gibbs Green Tenants and Residents Associations have launched legal proceedings against the planning policy underpinning the Earl’s Court scheme.
They claim the adoption of the Earl’s Court/West Kensington Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (LBHF) and by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) was unlawful.
They claim the adoption of the Earl’s Court/West Kensington Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (LBHF) and by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) was unlawful.
The claim was served on EC Properties, the wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital and Counties Properties (Capco); Transport for London; and the Mayor of London’s Office/Greater London Authority.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are your responsibility. Anyone posting inappropriate comments shall have their comment removed and will be banned from posting in future. Your IP address may also be recorded and reported. Persistent abuse shall mean comments will be severely restricted in future.