JACK MASON AND SCOTT DYLAN COMPLAIN TO THE DAME!

This comment below was placed by friends of Mason and Dylan.

He asks why the Dame is gunning for Mason and Dylan: simple answer? Numerous victims of these two read the Dame. One from 2006 wrote to the Dame with details of Dylan's 'issues' in 2006 and the anger of victims.

He goes on to portray his friends as victims.

This is what Judge Rajah had to say about the duo. 

The judge described Mason’s “various explanations” of the transfer of shares to be “deliberate falsehoods” and “deliberately false evidence intended to deceive the Court”.

One gets the distinct impression the judge thinks Mason, Dylan and Antrobus are not to be trusted! 

And this is what the British media had to say:

1. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/conrans-dream-collapses-into-chaos-

vvk5jfcft

2. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/apr/08/suite-dreams-how-luxury-

sofa-firm-makerson-left-its-clients-standing

3. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/katie-investigates/luxury-sofa-company-

took-3k-now-sued-complaining-trustpilot/

4. https://www.thebusinessdesk.com/northwest/news/2111229-report-filed-on-

conduct-of-inc-and-co-director

5. https://www.bigissuenorth.com/news/2023/03/sofa-so-good-2/

6. https://www.thebusinessdesk.com/northwest/news/2109171-the-murky-world-

of-inc-and-the-questions-jack-mason-wont-answer

7. https://www.thebusinessdesk.com/northwest/news/2108742-inc-and-co-

funder-cleaning-up-its-loan-books8. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/conran-brand-takeover-mired-in-red-ink-

9qr6tktm3

9. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-11751307/Sofa-firm-launched-

Habitat-founder-Sir-Terence-Conrans-grandson-Felix-sells-1.html

10. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-11921715/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL-

Zara-Mike-Tindall-break-convention-shunning-Royals-lawyers-Chester-firm.html

and this is what Mason wrote to one victim:

" We have nothing to hide so fuck your privileged friends and yourself! In fact, go fuck each other , you inbreeds!" (sic)

A comment....

"I've always wondered why The Dame seems to have such a big problem with these individuals. (Anyone having dealings with these two has big problems)

Once again, it looks like The Dame is presenting a heavily biased narrative, similar to what we often see from The Business Desk, which, let’s be honest, isn’t really providing a balanced view of the situation in the true sense. (The truth and balanced view is as the judge lays out: are you suggesting Judge Rajah is part of a vendetta?)

You can tell that the journalist writing these stories has a vendetta. (No, the journalist is just one of many who have understood how Dylan and Mason operate)

It feels like they’re more interested in stirring up controversy rather than considering the emerging facts. From what I’ve gathered, it appears that Barclays' own employees caused this situation, and now they seem to be trying to silence those involved through costly legal battles. (Oh, so now it's Barclays fault that the duo were able to abstract close to £14 million...the Dame better try this one!)

Isn't this turning into a real David vs. Goliath story? How can anyone possibly take on both a major bank and the media and hope to come out on top? (Don't take £14m off a major bank is the answer and then you won't need to worry about getting your arses kicked)

I genuinely feel sorry for these individuals. (More fool you)

Come on, The Dame, you’re better than this one-sided coverage."

So, instead of legal threats and Google take downs why have you not tried to justify your history...especially the 2006 experience in Ireland?