Monday, 5 February 2024

CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE: SCOTT DYLAN & ASSOCIATES IN APRIL




Michael Taylor is the Business Editor of The Business Desk. He is one of the very best investigative journalists.  
When people criticise the press we should remember the invaluable work carried out by skilled, forensic journalists.
We should all FOLLOW MICHAEL....This below is his update....

"A court date of January 25, 2025, has been agreed for a civil case brought by Barclays Bank against a Manchester-based businessman and his associates over £13.7m it claims they took from the bank without authorisation and for their “personal enrichment”.

Barclays Bank has a claim against Scott Dylan, Gareth Dylan, Sally Ann Glover and David Antrobus. 

A second claim is brought against Fresh Thinking Group (now known as Old3 Limited), its chief executive Jack Mason and Inc Travel Group Limited (now known as Old2 Limited) which are both now in compulsory liquidation.

Barclays’ case is that all the individual defendants, other than Gareth Dylan, were also involved in a conspiracy to cause damage to Barclays by unlawful means. The defendants deny the conspiracy allegation and are contesting the claims made by Barclays.

Another hearing has been scheduled for April 29, 2024 with Barclays claiming that the defendants breached a global freezing order and are therefore in contempt of court.

The claims arise from the transfer, by subsidiaries of Fresh Thinking Group, of some £13.7m from accounts held with Barclays which, at the time, had no or no material credit balance. 

Barclays says that there were some 830 payments of amounts just below the £50,000 threshold that would have caused the payment requests to have been referred for further approval.

Barclays says that the money went to Fresh Thinking Group and one of its other subsidiaries, FT Ops Limited before onward disbursement and the “personal enrichment” of the defendants."

5 comments:

  1. How dare this guy use his contacts at Google to destroy our asset. I see he's up for Contempt of Court. How can he purge it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whatever our political affiliations, the Dame offers a platform for civilised and enlightening debate. It can also be extremely witty. Free speech is precious. We must all defend it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What comes round goes round...VIVA the Dame

    ReplyDelete
  4. What happened on the 29 April court hearing? He's a slivering snake, escaping from every thing trying to catch him

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very good point. The hearing continues on July 1.https://caseboard.io/cases/6e602604-e489-4aab-b607-9a74a0a59906

    ReplyDelete

Comments are your responsibility. Anyone posting inappropriate comments shall have their comment removed and will be banned from posting in future. Your IP address may also be recorded and reported. Persistent abuse shall mean comments will be severely restricted in future.