Monday, 26 March 2018

SIGN THE PETITION TO SAVE SUTTON FROM VANDAL DEVELOPERS

The good question is why Sutton Estate has never been included in the Conservation Area.
The Dame suspects there were some dirty dealings to allow Affinity Sutton-now Clarion, to play the property developer.
Sutton is well loved by residents and its neighbours. Leave it alone!


SAVE SUTTON 

SIGN HERE

We ask that RBKC Council extend the Chelsea Conservation Area to include Sutton Estate which is under imminent threat of demolition due to the Planning Appeal by Clarion Group (formerly Affinity Sutton) which begins on 9th May 2018. The preservation of the Sutton Estate is strongly supported by The Victorian Society due to its fine architecture, historic value and its contribution to the Chelsea Conservation Area. 
Furthermore, RBKC has given no explanation whatsoever for why the Estate was not originally included in the Conservation Area, since all other buildings of that period are, and as a result remain protected from demolition.

17 comments:

  1. Signed! This is an absolute disgrace for RBKC, the Council should hang its head in shame over what is planned for Sutton Estate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shame, dear? That is merely your wishful thinking... unlikely to happen, unless the 'Peasants' revolt.

      Delete
    2. @Sad Badger - its time you put your name to your words

      Delete
    3. Better a 'peasant ' than an International Crook.

      Delete
  2. So wrong . Nothing has changed since Grenfell . Business as usual .

    ReplyDelete
  3. Surely it is going to appeal because RBKC's Planning Committee refused permission for the demolition?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Clarion put the appeal in on the day of The Grenfell Fire .

      Delete
  4. Yes the council did decline the preposterous redevelopment plan but the interesting question is Why was the whole estate not included in the conservation area in the first place ? Clearly RBKC was prepared some time ago to contemplate demolition of the majority of the estate. Robespierre

    ReplyDelete
  5. I believe the planning application was turned down on the basis of social housing shortfall and not because of demolition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not true . 1. Loss of Social Housing 2. Bland and Mediocre Architecture not in keeping with the local area . 3. Financial Viability Statement .

      Delete
  6. Sadiq Khan turned his back on Sutton residents, Sian Berry on the war path for him.

    Anyone know who is standing in the Stanley ward.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Social Cleansing in favour of money laundering foreigners and gangsters.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Is the Samuel Lewis estate listed ?

    ReplyDelete
  9. RBKC Conservatives - turning your borough into a 'Ghost Town' Day Trips on Crossrail 2 - to see how people used to live .

    ReplyDelete

Comments are your responsibility. Anyone posting inappropriate comments shall have their comment removed and will be banned from posting in future. Your IP address may also be recorded and reported. Persistent abuse shall mean comments will be severely restricted in future.