tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690720220183337557.post1622714762606391299..comments2024-03-28T19:46:33.269+00:00Comments on FTHN: From the Hornets Nest: Councillors demand Cockell ceases censoringUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690720220183337557.post-67129659197020602712011-06-01T09:29:53.814+01:002011-06-01T09:29:53.814+01:00... and don't forget, the Conservatives also u...... and don't forget, the Conservatives also used photographs paid for by the Council tax payer and published in this "a-political" Borough newsletter in their election propaganda last year. I hope they paid a royalty.Mussellnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690720220183337557.post-32771020981537316572011-06-01T08:52:47.615+01:002011-06-01T08:52:47.615+01:00I think Hornet posted on the costs of this a while...I think Hornet posted on the costs of this a while back, but that only included costs of printing and distribution. How much would it be if you include the Leaders's primping and preening team, photographers, editors, sub-editors, copywriters, designers, etc? If we need to disseminate information rather than this propaganda, it would be better done by buying a couple of pages in the local paper, which needs our support.Mosquitonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690720220183337557.post-69083231331081952792011-05-31T21:53:17.299+01:002011-05-31T21:53:17.299+01:00"The Royal Borough" is a pathetic news s..."The Royal Borough" is a pathetic news sheet for which Cllr Cockell employs a small army of expensive PR officers to peddle the propaganda of "The Leader's Leader"<br /><br />What a scandalous waste of money that is totally out of keeping with democratic valuesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690720220183337557.post-31214358199084592262011-05-31T16:32:43.323+01:002011-05-31T16:32:43.323+01:00There is a glossy 'newspaper' produced by ...There is a glossy 'newspaper' produced by RBKC. For some reason the title eludes me. The public is forced to pay for a propaganda sheet more appropriate to a totalitarian state, than a London borough. When will our councillors act to protect residents from such blatant misinformation, circulated by the Town Hall at residents' expense?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690720220183337557.post-90355660070225069852011-05-30T13:13:10.652+01:002011-05-30T13:13:10.652+01:00I think we have a bite...I think we have a bite...HornetsNesthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03986293957148642699noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690720220183337557.post-32130265398964708062011-05-30T12:57:22.808+01:002011-05-30T12:57:22.808+01:00Your headline "Councillors demand Cockell cea...Your headline "Councillors demand Cockell ceases censoring" might be sensational but the article is just waffle.<br /><br />No Councillors are mentioned who DEMAND anything. <br /><br />Maybe you DEMAND something and that is attentionAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com